Explanations in Microphysics: A response to van Fraassen's argument

Principia 12 (1):49-72 (2008)

Abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2008v12n1p49 The aim of this article is to offer a rejoinder to an argument against scientific realism put forward by van Fraassen, based on theoretical considerations regarding microphysics. At a certain stage of his general attack to scientific realism, van Fraassen argues, in contrast to what realists typically hold, that empirical regularities should sometimes be regarded as “brute facts”, which do not ask for explanation in terms of deeper, unobservable mechanisms. The argument from microphysics formulated by van Fraassen is based on the claim that in microphysics the demand for explanation leads to a demand for the so-called hidden-variable theories, which “runs contrary to at least one major school of thought in twentieth-century physics”. It is shown here that this argument does not represent an insurmountable obstacle to scientific realism, not even when a series of important theoretical and experimental results against hidden-variable theories — and not merely a conflict with a certain school of thought—is taken into account
Keywords Microfísica  Mecânica Quântica  Van Fraassen  Explicações Científicas  Abdução  Realismo Científico
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5007/1808-1711.2008v12n1p49
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,626
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):421-423.
Conjectures and Refutations.Karl R. Popper - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):159-168.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Realismo científico empirista.Silvio Seno Chibeni - 2010 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 1 (2):255-270.
Explanation and the Theory of Questions.Charles B. Cross - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (2):237 - 260.
A Paradox for Empiricism (?).Igor Douven - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):297.
Common-Sense Realism and the Unimaginable Otherness of Science.Bradley Monton - 2007 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 11 (2):117-126.
Constructive Empiricism and Anti-Realism.Sam Mitchell - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:174 - 180.
The Scientific Image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - Oxford University Press.
Unification and Scientific Realism Revisited.Malcolm R. Forster - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:394 - 405.
On Rejecting Foss's Image of Van Fraassen.Warren Bourgeois - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (2):303-308.
To Believe in Belief Popper and Van Fraassen on Scientific Realism.Herman C. D. G. De Regt - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (1):21 - 39.
Scientific Realism, Scientific Practice, and the Natural Ontological Attitude.André Kukla - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):955-975.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-04-12

Total views
124 ( #55,836 of 2,325,929 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #271,520 of 2,325,929 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature