AI and Society:1-21 (forthcoming)
AbstractThis paper traces the empiricist program from early debates between nativism and behaviorism within philosophy, through debates about early connectionist approaches within the cognitive sciences, and up to their recent iterations within the domain of deep learning. We demonstrate how current debates on the nature of cognition via deep network architecture echo some of the core issues from the Chomsky/Quine debate and investigate the strength of support offered by these various lines of research to the empiricist standpoint. Referencing literature from both computer science and philosophy, we conclude that the current state of deep learning does not offer strong encouragement to the empiricist side despite some arguments to the contrary.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Do submarines swim? Methodological dualism and anthropomorphizing AlphaGo.Vincent J. Carchidi - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-13.
Similar books and articles
In Defense of Nativism.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):693-718.
An Empirical Analysis of Perceptual Judgments.Nicholas Ray - 2014 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 9.
T.H. Morgan, Neither an Epistemological Empiricist nor a “Methodological” Empiricist.Marga Vicedo - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):293-311.
The Foundations of Empiricism an Inaugural Lecture.J. L. Evans - 1965 - University of Wales Press.
Infer with Care: A Critique of the Argument From Animals.Rachael L. Brown - 2019 - Mind and Language 34 (1):21-36.
Must Empiricism Be a Stance, and Could It Be One? How to Be an Empiricist and a Philosopher at the Same Time.Anja Jauernig - 2007 - In Bradley John Monton (ed.), Images of Empiricism: Essays on Science and Stances, with a Reply From Bas C. Van Fraassen. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 271-318.