Frames of Interpretations and the Container-Retrieval View: Reflections on a Theoretical Contest

In Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Springer Verlag (2015)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,878
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Heyting-Valued Interpretations for Constructive Set Theory.Nicola Gambino - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 137 (1-3):164-188.
What Memory Is.Stan Klein - 2015 - WIREs Cognitive Science 6 (1):1-38.
Quantum Reference Frames in the Context of EPR.Michael Dickson - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):655-668.
Interactive Alignment: Priming or Memory Retrieval?Michael Kaschak & Arthur Glenberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-202.
The Contest of Homer and Hesiod.M. L. West - 1967 - Classical Quarterly 17 (02):433-.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-04-28

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes