Synthese 16 (3-4):321 - 331 (1966)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
We first summarize and comment upon a 'calculus of intrinsic preferability'
which we have presented in detail elsewhere. 1 Then we set forth
'the problem of supererogation' - a problem which, according to some,
has presented difficulties for deontic logic. And, finally, we propose a
moral or deontic interpretation of the calculus of intrinsic preferability
which, we believe, enables us to solve the problem of supererogation.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00485086 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Supererogatory and How Not To Accommodate It: A Reply to Dorsey.Alfred Archer - 2016 - Utilitas 28 (2):179-188.
View all 16 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
The Case for Intrinsic Theory: III. Intrinsic Inner Awareness and the Problem of Straightforward Objectivation.Thomas Natsoulas - 1998 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 19 (1):1-19.
Deontic Morality and the Problem of Supererogation.Millard Schumaker - 1972 - Philosophical Studies 23 (6):427 - 428.
Supererogation for Utilitarianism.Jean-Paul Vessel - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):299 - 319.
Is It Bad to Omit an Act of Supererogation?Gregory Mellema - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:405-416.
On a Principle of Epistemic Preferability.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1969 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (2):294-301.
The Argument From Temporary Intrinsics.Ryan Wasserman - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):413 – 419.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
99 ( #118,194 of 2,507,126 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,393 of 2,507,126 )
2009-01-28
Total views
99 ( #118,194 of 2,507,126 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,393 of 2,507,126 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
