In Peter Sullivan Michael Potter (ed.), Wittgenstein's Tractatus. History and Interpretation. Cambridge: Oxford University Press. pp. 143-169 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Cora Diamond has claimed that Wittgenstein’s Tractatus contains an early ‘private language argument’: an argument that private objects in other people’s minds can play no role in the language I use for talking about their sensations. She further claims that the Tractatus contains an early version of the later idea that an inner process stands in need of outward criteria. The paper argues against these claims, on the grounds that they depend on an unwarranted construal of the Tractatus’s notion of use. It is further argued that Diamond’s interpretation makes a mystery of the relation between the Tractatus and Wittgenstein’s 1929 account of sensation language, set out in Philosophical Remarks and elsewhere. Finally, the paper considers and defends Michael Dummett’s contention that the Tractatus is a paradigm of semantic realism, in the light of Diamond’s claim that the Tractatus in fact suggests a form of anti-realism about sensation language.
|
Keywords | private language sensation language private language argument Tractatus Cora Diamond Michael Dummett realism Wittgenstein |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thought, Language, and the Argument From Explicitness.Agustín Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (3):381–401.
Phenomenal Concepts are Consistent with Wittgenstein’s Private Language Argument.Francois-Igor Pris - 2014 - NB: Philosophical Investigations (Russian E-Journal) 7:64-98.
On A Wittgensteinian Objection to Kripke’s Dualism Argument.Richard Double - 1981 - Philosophy Research Archives 1414:171-181.
The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):217-276.
Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language.Francis Y. Lin - 1999 - Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Language, Thought, and the Language of Thought (Aunty's Own Argument Revisited).Martin Davies - 1998 - In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (eds.), Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 226.
Where the Regress Argument Still Goes Wrong: Reply to Knowles.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 1999 - Analysis 59 (4):321-327.
Concepts, Connectionism, and the Language of Thought.Martin Davies - 1991 - In W Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 485-503.
Communication And The Complexity of Semantics.Peter Pagin - 2012 - In Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen & Edouard Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford University Press.
Kripke’s Wittgenstein and the Impossibility of Private Language.John A. Humphrey - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21 (January):197-207.
The Private Language Argument Isn't as Difficult, Nor as Dubious as Some Make Out.Roger Harris - 2007 - Sorites 18:98-108.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-02-02
Total views
31 ( #333,218 of 2,410,273 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #60,950 of 2,410,273 )
2014-02-02
Total views
31 ( #333,218 of 2,410,273 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #60,950 of 2,410,273 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads