Revus 29 (2016)

Abstract
The paper purports to provide an analytical treatment of the truth and legal interpretation issue. In the first part, it lays down a conceptual apparatus meant to capture the main aspects of the legal interpretation phenomenon, with particular attention paid to the several kinds of linguistic outputs resulting from interpretive activities. In the second part, it recalls three different notions of truth, focussing, so far as systemic truth is concerned, on the difference between deductive and rhetorical normative systems. In the third, and last, part, it shows in which ways the phenomenon of legal interpretation encompasses truth-apt entities, leaving the choice between austere and liberal alethic pluralism to the reader. A few, final remarks address the formalism/scepticism problem.
Keywords legal interpretation   interpretive scepticism   truth   interpretive sentence   interpretive formalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,025
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Interpretive Truth and Interpretive Validity: Remarks on Danto's Idea of "Constitutive Interpretation".Cristian Nae - 2009 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 1 (1):85-109.
Constitutional Interpretation.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1989 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Putting Interpretation in its Place.Timothy A. O. Endicott - 1994 - Law and Philosophy 13 (4):451 - 479.
Minimal Semantics and Legal Interpretation.Izabela Skoczeń - 2016 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 29 (3):615-633.
Is There a Single Right Interpretation?Michael Krausz - 2002 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation, and Judicial Review.David O. Brink - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (2):105-148.
Play, Agreement and Consensus.Tanya DiTommaso - 1996 - Man and World 29 (4):407-417.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-11-01

Total views
23 ( #464,659 of 60,983 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,046 of 60,983 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes