Journal of Business Ethics 130 (3):601-618 (2015)

Over time, according to popular and academic accounts, alternative trade initiatives [such as fair trade, organics, forest certification, and socially responsible investing ] almost invariably lose their oppositional stance and go mainstream. That is, they lose their alternative, usually peripheral, and often contrarian character. In this paper, I argue that this is not always the case and that the path to going mainstream is not always an unproblematic one. I observe that while scholars have documented various aspects of specific alternative trade initiatives, little comparative work has been done to theorize their different trajectories. To advance the scholarship, I compare two alternative trade movements, fair trade and SRI, and develop three hypotheses—the relation motivations hypothesis, the material interests hypothesis, and the organization of credibility hypothesis—that explain why going mainstream has been so hotly contested in the fair trade movement but not the SRI movement. I articulate these hypotheses and evaluate their merits.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2241-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Socially Responsible Investing in the United States.Steve Schueth - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):189 - 194.
Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Appraisal. [REVIEW]D. Bruce Johnsen - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):219 - 222.
Socially Responsible (Ethical) Investing in South Africa.S. Viviers - 2005 - African Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):21.
Does It Really Hurt to Be Responsible?Jacquelyn E. Humphrey & David T. Tan - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 122 (3):375-386.
Information Asymmetry and Socially Responsible Investment.Mark Jonathan Rhodes - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):145 - 151.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #641,639 of 2,533,643 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,643 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes