Behavior and Philosophy 31:127 - 137 (2003)

Authors
James Chisholm
University of Western Australia
Abstract
Two reviews of Death, Hope and Sex in Vol. 29 of this journal revealed some limitations in their authors' understanding of basic principles of evolutionary ecology and life history theory. Amin and Thompson's review criticized my model of the contingent development of alternative reproductive strategies as (1) being too strong, (2) being too mentalistic, (3) being too reliant on the flawed optimality assumption, (4) committing the Naturalistic Fallacy, and (5) ignoring group selection arguments. I accept only the latter criticism. Rushton's review criticizes me for not writing a book about genes, intelligence, and "race" and massively misunderstands the optimality assumption and role of individual differences in evolutionary theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,797
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Selection and Causation.Mohan Matthen & André Ariew - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (2):201-224.
Optimality Modeling in a Suboptimal World.Angela Potochnik - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):183-197.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
10 ( #852,540 of 2,425,657 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #546,862 of 2,425,657 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes