The central aim of this article is to discuss Russell's analysis of the notion of cause. In his presidential address to the Aristotelian Society in 1912, Russell put forward several theses on causality in general, and specially on its role in science. He claimed that although vague references to causal laws are often found in the beginnings of science, "in the advanced sciences” the word 'cause' never occurs". Furthermore, Russell maintained that even in philosophy the word 'cause' is "so inextricably bound up with misleading associations" that it would be desirable to promote its "complete extrusion from the philosophical vocabulary". These positions are rendered particular/y strong by Russell's explicit adhesion to the regular sequence view of causation, which he attributed to Hume. Essentially the same opinions were repeated in a series of lectures delivered in Boston two years later. After a systematic exposition of the main theses advanced by Russell on these two occasions, we trace their origin to his general conception of science. Then we examine the substantial changes that Russell's views on causality underwent several decades later. We remark that these changes seem to be intimately associated with the adoption of a new epistemological position concerning the nature of our knowledge of the external world, involving some clear elements of realism and naturalism.
Keywords realism  naturalism  Hume  Russell  induction  causality
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,304
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism.R. Healey - 2001 - Mind 110 (439):777-780.
The Problems of Philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - Mind 21 (84):556-564.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Russell e a Noção de Causa.Sílvio Seno Chibeni - 2001 - Principia: Revista Internacional de Epistemologia 5 (1-2):125-147.
Causal Realism and the Laws of Nature.Richard Corry - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (3):261-276.
Causes: Philosophy.Marjorie Grene - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (144):149-159.
Russell Versus Steiner on Physics and Causality.Alexander Rosenberg - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (2):341-347.
Bertrand Russell, the Social Scientist.Bertrand Russell (ed.) - 1973 - Bertrand Russell Supranational Society.
Causação e Física Clássica: existe possibilidade de conciliação?Túlio Roberto Xavier de Aguiar - 2013 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16 (3):353-364.
Bertrand Russell's Flirtation with Behaviorism.Richard F. Kitchener - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):273 - 291.
Review of Osman Emalı, Bertrand Russell’s Moral Philosophy.Gülberk Koç - 2009 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 29 (1).
Russell on Incomplete Symbols.Bryan Pickel - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):909-923.
Russell's External World: 1912-1921.Ronald W. Nusenoff - 1978 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 29:65.
Russell's External World: 1912-1921.Ronald E. Nusenoff - 2014 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies.


Added to PP index

Total views
10 ( #803,230 of 2,330,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #583,587 of 2,330,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes