Abstract
Historians and philosophers of science have furnished a wide array of theoretical-historiographical terms to emphasize the discontinuities among different systems of knowledge. Some of the most famous include Thomas Kuhn’s “paradigm”, Michel Foucault’s “episteme”, and the notion of “styles of reasoning” more recently developed by Ian Hacking and Arnold Davidson. This paper takes up this theoretical-historiographical thread by assessing the values and limitations of the notion of “style” for the historical and philosophical study of science. Specifically, reflecting on various methodological and theoretical concerns prompted by sexuality, translation, and East Asian studies, this paper argues that the heretofore ways in which historians and philosophers of science have used the notion of “style” are severely restricted in terms of its mere applicability to the intellectual history of Western science. The particular example of the translation of “homosexuality” into Chinese during the May Fourth era reveals that the notion of “style” has the potential of carrying a much more dynamic conceptual weight, as when used in “styles of argumentation”. The paper also engages briefly with the historiography of scientific “national styles” and ends with some concluding remarks on the limitations of “social histories from below” and the under appreciated importance of “epistemological histories of possibilities”.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsc.2009.03.003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,156
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
Against Method.Paul Feyerabend - 1975 - London: New Left Books.
Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact.Ludwik Fleck - 1979 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

East Asian Philosophy and the Case Against Perfect Translations.James Heisig - 2010 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (1):81-90.
Personal Style and Artistic Style.Nick Riggle - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (261):711-731.
East Asian Semiotics.Dennis C. H. Cheng - 2007 - American Journal of Semiotics 23 (1/4):19-37.
From Idealism to Pragmatism: India and Asian Regional Integration.Rajendra K. Jain - 2011 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 12 (2):213-231.
Ludwik Fleck and the Concept of Style in the Natural Sciences.Claus Zittel - 2012 - Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):53-79.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
34 ( #302,174 of 2,411,819 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,411,819 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes