Reply to Wolff, Plato, Smith, Churchill and Aristotle on democracy

Think 8 (22):93-99 (2009)

Abstract

Fraser Smith argues that Plato's argument against democracy as reconstructed by Jonathon Wolff is flawed because in a ‘modern’ democracy the people do not rule, but instead elect officials subject to a system of checks and balances. Smith's conception of democracy is much like Churchill's . I will argue that Smith's reply does not address Wolff and Plato's argument. I will then point out that Aristotle replied to Plato's argument in an appealing – and strikingly modern – fashion. Aristotle, I conclude, did justify to at least some degree democracy, and hence did address Plato's argument

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
50 (#230,860)

6 months
1 (#386,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Childers
Czech Academy of Sciences

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles