Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):54--78 (2007)
Abstract |
In the final chapter of their book A Subject With No Object, John Burgess and Gideon Rosen raise the question of the value of the nominalistic reconstructions of mathematics that have been put forward in recent years, asking specifically what this body of work is good for. The authors conclude that these reconstructions are all inferior to current versions of mathematics (or science) and make no advances in science. This paper investigates the reasoning that led to such a negative appraisal, and it produces a rebuttal to this reasoning. I am grateful to the following mathematicians who were kind enough to provide me with their thoughts about nonstandard analysis: Martin Davis, Laura Chihara, Ted Chihara, Steve Galovich, Bonnie Gold, and especially Roger Simons, whose comments about an earlier version of this paper were very helpful. Thanks also go to two referees for their useful suggestions and criticisms of an earlier version of this paper.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2007 |
DOI | 10.1093/philmat/nkl023 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 14 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Stevin Numbers and Reality.Karin Usadi Katz & Mikhail G. Katz - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (2):109-123.
No Reservations Required? Defending Anti-Nominalism.Alan Baker - 2010 - Studia Logica 96 (2):127-139.
Mario Bunge’s Philosophy of Mathematics: An Appraisal.Jean-Pierre Marquis - 2012 - Science & Education 21 (10):1567-1594.
Similar books and articles
Burgess on Plural Logic and Set Theory.Øystein Linnebo - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):79-93.
Review of J. P. Burgess and G. A. Rosen, A Subject With No Object. Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics. [REVIEW]Michael D. Resnik - 1999 - Noûs 33 (3):505–516.
Burgess's ‘Scientific’ Arguments for the Existence of Mathematical Objects.Chihara Charles - 2006 - Philosophia Mathematica 14 (3):318-337.
A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography.Karin Usadi Katz & Mikhail G. Katz - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (1):51-89.
A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics.John P. Burgess & Gideon Rosen - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
54 ( #184,801 of 2,411,338 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,261 of 2,411,338 )
2009-01-28
Total views
54 ( #184,801 of 2,411,338 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,261 of 2,411,338 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads