The dilemmas of seditious men: the CrowtherHessen correspondence in the 1930s Highly commended essay, BSHS Singer Prize . The research and preparation of this paper were financially supported by a postgraduate research award from the Arts and Humanities Research Board for which I remain extremely grateful. Thanks are also due to Professor Robert Fox and Dr David Priestland, my supervisors, for their inexhaustible perseverance and patience with this errant student. Linacre College, especially Jane Edwards, has been instrumental in helping my research proceed as painlessly as possible. Staff at the Special Collections, University of Sussex, and the Manuscript Collections, University of Edinburgh Library, were extremely facilitating and hospitable. Further intellectual and personal debts are due to John Christie, Geoffrey Cantor, Graeme Gooday, Paul Josephson and Gennady Gorelik. My close friends Andrew Player, Becky Shtasel, Keith Pennington and Kate Douglas helped with support, dialecti [Book Review]
British Journal for the History of Science 36 (4):417-435 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0007087403005156 |
| Options |
Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Claiming Ownership in the Technosciences: Patents, Priority and Productivity.Christine Macleod & Gregory Radick - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):188-201.
J.G. Crowther's War: Institutional Strife at the BBC and British Council.Allan Jones - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Science 49 (2):259-278.
Similar books and articlesNewton Dpossd! The British Response to the Pascal Forgeries of 1867 Highly Commended Essay, BSHS Singer Prize . I Would Like to Thank The Royal Society, University College London and the University of London for Permission to Quote From Manuscript Material in Their Possession. I Am Also Grateful for the Comments of Rob Iliffe on an Earlier Version of This Paper, and Those of the Anonymous Reviewer. [REVIEW]Rebekah Higgitt - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Science 36 (4):437-453.
Integrative Research in the University Context: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, The Australian National University.Robert Wasson & Stephen Dovers - 2005 - Journal of Research Practice 1 (2):Article M4.
Atomic Secrets and Governmental Lies: Nuclear Science, Politics and Security in the Pontecorvo Case Winner, BSHS Singer Prize . I Would Like to Thank Jeff Hughes and Jon Agar for Advice and Criticism. I Am Grateful Also to the CHSTM Staff and Students for Support and Exchange of Ideas. I Am Indebted to the Archivists at the PRO and at the Churchill College Archive Centre for Their Help. Finally I Am Most Grateful to the Laboratorio Scienza Epistemologia E Ricerca . This Paper is Based on a Research Project Funded by the CHSTM and the ESRC Jointly. [REVIEW]Simone Turchetti - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Science 36 (4):389-415.
How to Make a University History of Science Museum: Lessons From Leeds.Claire L. Jones - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):716-724.
A Rediscovery of Scientific Collections as Material Heritage? The Case of University Collections in Germany.David Ludwig & Cornelia Weber - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):652-659.
Integrity in Postgraduate Research: The Student Voice.Saadia Mahmud & Tracey Bretag - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (6):1657-1672.
Scientific Collections as Material Heritage.David Ludwig - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):652–659.
Moorean Absurdity and Showing What's Within.Mitchell Green - 2007 - In Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.
Creating the Royal Societys Sylvester Medal I Am Indebted to the Leverhulme Trust for the Award of a Major Research Fellowship, Which has Enabled Me to Pursue Research for This Paper. For Permission to Quote From Unpublished Archive Material I Would Like to Thank the Royal Society of London, the Maccabans and the Archives of Imperial College, London. For Their Generous Assistance with Various Aspects of This Project I Would Like to Express My Appreciation to the Hartley Library , Anne Barrett, Norman Biggs, Barbara Cantor, Hannah Gay, Karen Hunger Parshall and Two Anonymous Referees. [REVIEW]Geoffrey Cantor - 2004 - British Journal for the History of Science 37 (1):75-92.
Balancing Agendas: Social Sciences and Humanities in Europe.Gabriele Griffin - 2006 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 5 (3):229-241.
Institutional Barriers to Research on Sensitive Topics: Case of Sex Communication Research Among University Students.Carey M. Noland - 2012 - Journal of Research Practice 8 (1):Article - M2.
The Routledge Doctoral Supervisor's Companion: Supporting Effective Research in Education and the Social Sciences.Melanie Walker & Pat Thomson (eds.) - 2010 - Routledge.
Academic Guidance in Medical Student Research: How Well Do Supervisors and Students Understand the Ethics of Human Research?Kathryn M. Weston, Judy R. Mullan, Wendy Hu, Colin Thomson, Warren C. Rich, Patricia Knight-Billington, Brahmaputra Marjadi & Peter L. McLennan - 2016 - Journal of Academic Ethics 14 (2):87-102.
Tales of the Unexpected: Supervisors’ and Students’ Perspectives on Short‐Term Projects and Dissertations.Paquita McMichael - 1992 - Educational Studies 18 (3):299-310.
Added to PP index
2016-06-30
Total downloads
13 ( #407,193 of 2,236,149 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #35,569 of 2,236,149 )
2016-06-30
Total downloads
13 ( #407,193 of 2,236,149 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #35,569 of 2,236,149 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads
My notes
