Religious Studies 34 (2):205-217 (1998)

Authors
Andrew Chignell
Princeton University
Abstract
The problem of infant suffering and death is often regarded as one of the more difficult versions of the problem of evil (see Ivan Karamazov), especially when one considers how God can be thought good to infant victims by the infant victims. In the first section of this paper, I examine two recent theodicies that aim to solve this problem but (I argue) fail. In the second section, I suggest that the only viable approach to the problem rejects the idea that the suffering of such unfortunates must be defeated by some greater good.
Keywords evil  infants  theodicy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S003441259800434X
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,742
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Disability and the Theodicy of Defeat.Aaron D. Cobb & Kevin Timpe - 2017 - Journal of Analytic Theology 5:100-120.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Against Multiverse Theodicies.Bradley Monton - 2010 - Philo 13 (2):113-135.
Logical Problem of Evil.James R. Beebe - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Philosophy of Evil.Lars Fr H. Svendsen - 2010 - Dalkey Archive Press.
The Argument From Evil.Andrea M. Weisberger - 2007 - In Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Infant Suffering Revisited.Andrew Chignell - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (4):475-484.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
190 ( #46,807 of 2,349,887 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #239,783 of 2,349,887 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes