Three Skeptics and the Critique: Review of Michael Forster's Kant and Skepticism

Philosophical Books 51 (4):228-244 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A long critical notice of Michael Forster's recent book, "Kant and Skepticism." We argue that Forster's characterization of Kant's response to skepticism is both textually dubious and philosophically flawed. -/- .

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Review: Forster, Michael, Kant and Skepticism.Colin Marshall - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2):pp. 319-320.
Kant and Skepticism.Michael N. Forster (ed.) - 2009 - Princeton University Press.
Knowledge and Skepticism. [REVIEW]John Turri - 2011 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 1 (2):155-157.
Hegel and Skepticism.Michael N. Forster - 1989 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
A Short Comment on Michael Forster’s Paper.Thomas Dewender - 2015 - In Andreas Speer, Wolfram Hogrebe & Markus Gabriel, Das Neue Bedürfnis Nach Metaphysik / the New Desire for Metaphysics. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 29-32.
Cartesian Skepticism and the Epistemic Priority Thesis.Brian Ribeiro - 2002 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):573-586.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-14

Downloads
921 (#25,903)

6 months
126 (#45,328)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andrew Chignell
Princeton University
Colin McLear
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

The Dissatisfied Skeptic in Kant's Discipline of Pure Reason.Charles Goldhaber - 2023 - Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 4 (2):157-177.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references