Philosophical Books 51 (4):228-244 (2010)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
A long critical notice of Michael Forster's recent book, "Kant and Skepticism." We argue that Forster's characterization of Kant's response to skepticism is both textually dubious and philosophically flawed. -/- .
|
| Keywords | Kant epistemology skepticism |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-0149.2010.00513.x |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Greek Skepticism; a Study in Epistemology.Charlotte L. Stough - 1969 - Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hegel and the Transformation of Philosophical Critique.William F. Bristow - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Skeptics Can Win (But Almost Never Will).Timothy Pickavance - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):371-394.
Sensibilism, Psychologism, and Kant's Debt to Hume.Brian A. Chance - 2011 - Kantian Review 16 (3):325-349.
Kant's Response to Skepticism.Robert Stern - 2008 - In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press. pp. 265.
Feminist Epistemology, Contextualism, and Philosophical Skepticism.Evelyn Brister - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (5):671-688.
Review: Forster, Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW]Craig French - 2009 - Heythrop Journal 50 (2):334-335.
Review: Forster, Michael, Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW]Robert Hanna - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):635-637.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-01-14
Total views
441 ( #21,120 of 2,498,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #25,619 of 2,498,178 )
2011-01-14
Total views
441 ( #21,120 of 2,498,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #25,619 of 2,498,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
