The tribunal of philosophy and its norms: History and philosophy in Georges Canguilhem's historical epistemology

Abstract
In this article I assess Georges Canguilhem's historical epistemology with both theoretical and historical questions in mind. From a theoretical point of view, I am concerned with the relation between history and philosophy, and in particular with the philosophical assumptions and external norms that are involved in history writing. Moreover, I am concerned with the role that history can play in the understanding and evaluation of philosophical concepts. From a historical point of view, I regard historical epistemology, as developed by Gaston Bachelard and Georges Canguilhem, as a conception and practice which came out of the project, elaborated in France from the 1920s to the 1940s, of combining history of science and philosophy. I analyse in particular Canguilhem's epistemology in his theory and practice of history of science. What he called 'normative history' is the focus of my analysis. I evaluate the question of the nature and provenience of the norm employed in normative history, and I compare it with the norm as discussed by Canguilhem in Le normal et le pathologique. While I am critical of Canguilhem's treatment of history, I conclude that his philosophical suggestion to analyse the formation of scientific concepts 'from below' represents a useful model for history and philosophy of science, and that it can be very profitably extended to philosophical concepts.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S1369-8486(03)00027-X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,169
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Historical Epistemology.Lorraine Daston - 1994 - In James K. Chandler, Arnold Ira Davidson & Harry D. Harootunian (eds.), Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice, and Persuasion Across the Disciplines. University of Chicago Press. pp. 282--289.
La Vie : L'Expérience Et la Science.Michel Foucault - 1985 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 90 (1):3 - 14.
Helene Metzger: The History of Science Between the Study of Mentalities and Total History.C. Chimisso - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):203-241.
The Social and the Cognitive: Resources for the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.M. Nicolson - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (2):347-369.
Le Statut Épistémologique de la Médecine.Georges Canguilhem - 1988 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 10:15 - 29.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
48 ( #111,605 of 2,191,873 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #288,547 of 2,191,873 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature