Causes and probability-raisers of processes

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):81 – 91 (2007)

Authors
Sungho Choi
Kyung Hee University
Abstract
Schaffer proposes a new account of probabilistic causation that synthesizes the probability-raising and process-linkage views on causation. The driving idea of Schaffer's account is that, although an effect does not invariably depend on its cause, a process linked to the effect does. In this paper, however, I will advance counterexamples to Schaffer's account and then demonstrate that Schaffer's possible responses to them do not work. Finally, I will argue that my counterexamples suggest that the driving idea of Schaffer's account is misdirected.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048400601154400
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,984
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Papers Vol. II.Lewis David - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Causation as Influence.David Lewis - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):182-197.
Causation.David Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (17):556-567.
Causation and the Price of Transitivity.Ned Hall - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):198.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
56 ( #128,034 of 2,319,647 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #440,827 of 2,319,647 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature