Israel, Lebanon, and the "Peace Process"
That right, of course, is conditional on U.S. decisions. Since World War II, the U.S. has controlled the region, recognizing it to be "a stupendous source of strategic power, and one of the greatest material prizes in world history." Washington's support of the right of return was rhetorical only, and has been officially abandoned by the Clinton Administration. By U.S. decision, then, the refugees are a problem for Lebanon and Jordan, and do not have the rights accorded them by the community of nations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
War and Peace in Jewish Tradition: From the Biblical World to the Present: The Third Annual Conference of the Israel Heritage Department Ariel, Israel.Yigal Levin & Amnon Shapira (eds.) - 2012 - Routledge.
Emotions and Perceived Risks After the 2006 Israel–Lebanon War.Uri Benzion, Shosh Shahrabani & Tal Shavit - 2009 - Mind and Society 8 (1):21-41.
War and Peace in Jewish Tradition: From the Biblical World to the Present.Yigal Levin & Amnon Shapira (eds.) - 2011 - Routledge.
Historicity and the Politics of Predication.Joseph Margolis - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):79-100.
Retooling Peace Philosophy : A Critical Look at Israel's Separation Strategy.J. Peterson-Overton Kristofer, D. Schmidt Johannes & Jaques Hersh - 2010 - In Candice C. Carter & Ravindra Kumar (eds.), Peace Philosophy in Action. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads6 ( #557,642 of 2,168,644 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,816 of 2,168,644 )
How can I increase my downloads?