Leaping into the Boundless: A Daoist Reading of Comparative Religious Ethics

Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):139-165 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This essay seeks to step beyond the argument between ethical formalism and ethical naturalism concerning the nature of moral reason and to step outside the universalism versus relativism debate in cross-cultural studies. Its thesis is that both formalism and naturalism advance versions of moral reason that are functionaries of intellectual discussions that make sense of behavior and that such discussion should not be confused with the ostensible object of ethical inquiry-that is, with moral actions and the motivations that drive them. Daoist thought provides a comparative base from which the nature and limitation of such ethical theories can be examined. The essay concludes by suggesting that the objectification and scrutiny of our own forms of knowledge can be a specific purpose of comparative ethics, which has the virtue of making explicit the value commitments behind our intellectual theories



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heuristic Power as the Test of Theory: A Response to Francisca Cho.Ronald M. Green - 1998 - Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):175 - 184.
Introduction.Robin W. Lovin & Frank E. Reynolds - 1986 - Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (1):48-60.
Teaching Comparative Religious Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW]Kevin Schilbrack - 2002 - Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):295 - 312.
Cosmogony and the "Questions of Ethics".Ronald M. Green & Charles H. Reynolds - 1986 - Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (1):139 - 156.
Judging Others: History, Ethics, and the Purposes of Comparison.Aaron Stalnaker - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics.David Little - 1981 - Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):210 - 227.
Comparative Ethics, Ideologies, and Critical Thought.Roderick Hindery - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):215-231.


Added to PP

10 (#881,815)

6 months
3 (#210,327)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Normativity in Comparative Religious Ethics.Kevin Jung - 2017 - Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (4):642-665.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references