On Israel, lebanon and palestine
The "moral justification" is supposed to be that capturing soldiers in a cross border raid, and killing others, is an outrageous crime. We know, for certain, that Israel, the United States and other Western governments, as well as the mainstream of articulate Western opinion, do not believe a word of that. Sufficient evidence is their tolerance for many years of US backed Israeli crimes in Lebanon, including four invasions before this one, occupation in violation of Security Council orders for 22 years, and regular killings and abductions. To mention just one question that every journal should be answering: When did Nasrallah assume a leadership role? Answer: When the Rabin government escalated its crimes in Lebanon, murdering Sheikh Abbas Mussawi and his wife and child with missiles fired from a US helicopter. Nasrallah was chosen as his successor. Only one of innumerable cases. There is, after all, a good reason why last February, 70% of Lebanese called for the capture of Israeli soldiers for prisoner exchange.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Soldiers with Conscience Never Die--They Are Just Ignored by Their Society. Moral Disobedience in the Israel Defense Forces.Ruth Linn - 2002 - Journal of Military Ethics 1 (2):57-76.
Emotions and Perceived Risks After the 2006 Israel–Lebanon War.Uri Benzion, Shosh Shahrabani & Tal Shavit - 2009 - Mind and Society 8 (1):21-41.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #296,158 of 2,163,655 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,655 )
How can I increase my downloads?