Abstract
Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should be mitigated. We make preliminary recommendations for the structure and process of research ethics consultation, based on our initial experiences in a pilot program.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/15265160802132951
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,682
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Any Help From Strangers at the Benchside?Albert R. Jonsen - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):19 – 20.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 28 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
37 ( #263,689 of 2,349,382 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #239,083 of 2,349,382 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes