Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation

American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4 – 13 (2008)

Authors
Abstract
Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should be mitigated. We make preliminary recommendations for the structure and process of research ethics consultation, based on our initial experiences in a pilot program.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15265160802109322
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,992
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thinking About the Human Neuron Mouse.Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):27 – 40.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Toward a Better Bioethics.Jason Scott Robert - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):283-291.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
25 ( #294,136 of 2,319,671 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #226,816 of 2,319,671 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature