Some meta-theoretical issues relating to statistical inference

This paper is a reply to some comments made by Green on Chow ’s critique of Wilkinson and Task Force's report on statistical inference. Issues raised are the inappropriateness of accepting methodological prescription on authority, the vacuity of non-falsifiable theories, the need to distinguish between experiment and meta﷓experiment, and the probability foundation of the null﷓hypothesis significance ﷓ test procedure. This reply is intended to foster a better understanding of research methods in general, and of the role of NHSTP in empirical research in particular.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,478
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
15 ( #320,038 of 2,180,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #302,018 of 2,180,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums