How Procreation Generates Parental Rights and Obligations

In Michael Cholbi & Jaime Ahlberg (eds.), Procreation, Parenthood, and Educational Rights: Ethical and Philosophical Issues. Routledge (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Philosophical defenses of parents’ rights typically appeal to the interests of parents, the interests of children, or some combination of these. Here I propose that at least in the case of biological, non-adoptive parents, these rights have a different normative basis: namely, these rights should be accorded to biological parents because of the compensatory duties such parents owe their children by virtue of having brought them into existence. Inspried by Seana Shiffrin, I argue that procreation inevitably encumbers the wills of children in otherwise morally objectionable ways. Such subjection generates duties to compensate children, even if the child’s life is on balance a benefit to her. The right to procreate is thus conditioned on prospective parent’s willingness to compensate for the harms of procreation. And because parents bear such compensatory duties, they must be accorded permissions (i.e., rights) to fulfill these duties. These rights include familiar exclusionary rights to promote children’s welfare, etc. Moreover, because subjecting children to harms or the risks thereof violates their autonomy, parental duties (and rights) include the provision of education and other goods that enable their subsequent autonomy as adults. Grounding parental rights in compensatory procreative duties avoids problems associated with appeals to the interests of children (e.g., that these interests do not seem to generate exclusive parental rights) or to the interests of parents (e.g., that these interests do not appear strong enough to permit the creation of a new, vulnerable human individual).



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fundamental interests and parental rights.Michael W. Austin - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):221-235.
Parents' Rights.J. T. Thornton - 1987 - Dissertation, Rice University
Parental consent and the use of dead children's bodies.T. M. Wilkinson - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.
Child Abuse: parental rights and the interests of the child.David Archard - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):183-194.
Parental Responsibility and Entitlement.Anna-Karin Andersson - 2014 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):49-69.
Procreative Justice: A Contractualist Approach.Rivka M. Weinberg - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
How Do We Acquire Parental Rights?Joseph Millum - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):112-132.
Parental Rights and Due Process.Donald C. Hubin - 1999 - The Journal of Law and Family Studies 1 (2):123-150.
On Reproduction: Rights, Responsibilities and Males.Barbara Jean Hall - 1997 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Qué hijos tener. Libertad procreativa, autonomía parental y principio del daño.Blanca Rodríguez López - 2011 - Telos: Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 18 (1):127-151.
Parents' Rights and Educational Provision.Roger Marples - 2013 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (1):23-39.


Added to PP

835 (#18,719)

6 months
297 (#7,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Cholbi
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Deflating Parental Rights.James G. Dwyer - 2021 - Law and Philosophy 40 (4):387-418.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A defense of abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Doing Away with Harm.Ben Bradley - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):390-412.
Harm.Michael Rabenberg - 2015 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 8 (3):1-32.
The Moral of Moral Luck.Susan Wolf - 2001 - Philosophic Exchange 31 (1).

View all 9 references / Add more references