Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (5):1119-1133 (2018)

Michael Cholbi
University of Edinburgh
Most advanced industrial societies are ‘work-centered,’ according high value and prestige to work. Indeed, belief in an interpersonal moral duty to work is encoded in both popular attitudes toward work and in policies such as ‘workfare’. Here I argue that despite the intuitive appeal of reciprocity or fair play as the moral basis for a duty to work, the vast majority of individuals in advanced industrialized societies have no such duty to work. For current economic conditions, labor markets, and government policies entail that the conditions for a reciprocity-based argument to apply to most workers are not usually met. More specifically, many workers fail to provide valuable goods through working or their working does not result in net social benefit. Concurrently, many workers do not receive adequate benefits from working in that they neither have their basic needs met or do not even enjoy an improvement in welfare thanks to working. Hence, workers neither provide nor receive the benefits needed for a reciprocity-based duty to work to apply to them. Furthermore, these conditions are conditions over which workers themselves have very little control. Most workers therefore could not fulfill their ostensible duty to work even if they made conscientious efforts to do so. In most cases, a person who fails to work morally wrongs no one, and in the case of any particular individual or worker, the defeasible presumption ought to be that she has no duty to work.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-018-9942-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Rescuing Justice and Equality.G. A. Cohen (ed.) - 2008 - Harvard University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good.John Rawls - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (4):251-276.
Productive Justice.Lucas Stanczyk - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 40 (2):144-164.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Philosophical Approaches to Work and Labor.Michael Cholbi - 2022 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
‘But It’s Your Job!’ the Moral Status of Jobs and the Dilemma of Occupational Duties.Lisa Herzog & Frauke Schmode - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Justice, Work, and the Ghetto Poor.Tommie Shelby - 2012 - The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 6 (1):69-96.
Fair Play and Wrongful Benefits.Avia Pasternak - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 14 (5):515-534.
Fair Play and Wrongful Benefits.Avia Pasternak - forthcoming - New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy.
The Exercise of Moral Imagination in Stigmatized Work Groups.Esther Roca - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (1):135 - 147.
Moral Problems of Employing Foreign Workers.Aviva Geva - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (3):381-403.
Rescue and the Duty to Aid.Violetta Igneski - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Is There a Moral Duty to Obey the Law?John Hasnas - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):450-479.


Added to PP index

Total views
161 ( #73,800 of 2,519,659 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #18,787 of 2,519,659 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes