Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1):22-25 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In ‘Why Abortion is Immoral’, Don Marquis argues that abortion is wrong for the same reason that murder is wrong, namely, that it deprives a human being of an FLO, a ‘future like ours,’ which is a future full of value and the experience of life. Marquis’ argument rests on the assumption that the human being is somehow deprived by suffering an early death. I argue that Marquis’ argument faces the ‘Epicurean Challenge’. The concept of ‘deprivation’ requires that some discernible individual exists who can be deprived. But if death involves total annihilation, then no discernible individual exists to be so deprived. I argue that the Epicurean Challenge must be addressed before it can be proven that Marquis is correct to claim that abortion and murder are wrong because they deprive someone of an FLO.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The parenthood argument.William Simkulet - 2017 - Bioethics 32 (1):10-15.
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
Abortion, competing entitlements, and parental responsibility.Alex Rajczi - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):379-395.
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
The Marquis de Sade and induced abortion.A. D. Farr - 1980 - Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (1):7-10.
A Present Like Ours.Michael Davis - 2013 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):75-90.
A future like ours revisited.M. T. Brown - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):192-195.
Abortion, Persons, and Futures of Value.Donald Wilson - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):86-97.
The deprivation argument against abortion.Dean Stretton - 2004 - Bioethics 18 (2):144–180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-15

Downloads
157 (#118,144)

6 months
15 (#159,128)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anna B. Christensen
Central College

References found in this work

Why abortion is immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
Death.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Noûs 4 (1):73-80.
The evil of death.Harry S. Silverstein - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (7):401-424.
How to Be Dead and Not Care: A Defense of Epicurus.Stephen E. Rosenbaum - 1986 - American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (2):217 - 225.

View all 16 references / Add more references