Ethics and Global Politics 1 (3) (2008)
Cosmopolitanism in normative theory of transnational justice is often characterized by the thesis that the moral and legal status of states must be entirely derived from the moral status of the individuals who constitute them. Although the thesis itself is rather indeterminate in substantive and analytical content, it is generally understood as the claim that states should not be granted the status of moral and legal agents sui generis. This article argues that such a view is analytically and methodologically misleading, and that any fruitful approach towards a liberal theory of transnational justice must face the challenge of coming up with a more complex concept of statehood, and acknowledge that in international relations and international law states are collective moral agents in their own right that can be addressees of genuinely collective forms responsibility. The argument starts with a critical examinations of two common interpretations of the cosmopolitan thesis, a reductivist reading, which suggests that we can reduce the moral and legal status of states to the rights and duties of the individuals (section I), and a methodological reading, which suggests that the moral status of individuals must based on the acknowledgment of “universal” individual rights (section II). For different reasons, both readings are argued to fail. Section III then presents an outline of how to conceive of states as agents that possess moral and legal status sui generis and be addressees of collective responsibility. Keywords : cosmopolitanism, statism, ethical individualism, methodological individualism, collective agents, collective responsibility (Published online: 25 August, 2008) Citation: Ethics & Global Politics 2008. DOI: 10.3402/egp.v1i3.1859
|Keywords||Collective agents Ethical individualism Statism Methodological individualism Collective responsibility Cosmopolitanism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Cosmopolitanism with Room for Nationalism.Win-Chiat Lee - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (2):279-293.
Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism: Representation and Leadership in Transnational Democracy.Daniel Bray - 2011 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Cosmopolitanism and the Need for Transnational Criminal Justice.Patrick Hayden - 2004 - Theoria 51 (104):69-95.
Justice, Cosmopolitanism and Policy Prescription: Gillian Brock’s "Global Justice".Cindy Holder - 2012 - Diametros 31 (31):138-145.
Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship.Pauline Kleingeld - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Cosmopolitanisms: New Thinking and New Directions.R. J. Holton - 2009 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Six Varieties of Cosmopolitanism in Late Eighteenth-Century Germany.Pauline Kleingeld - 1999 - Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (3):505-524.
Power and the Politics of Difference: Oppression, Empowerment, and Transnational Justice.Amy Allen - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (3):pp. 156-172.
Citizen of the World: A Cosmopolitan Ideal for the 21st Century.Peter Kemp - 2010 - Humanity Books.
Transnational Legal Sites and Democracy-Building Reconfiguring Political Geographies.S. Benhabib - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (4-5):471-486.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads24 ( #200,457 of 2,058,163 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #295,918 of 2,058,163 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.