Consciousness and information processing: A reply to durgin

Consciousness and Cognition 11 (2):372-374 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Durgin's (2002) commentary on our article provides us with an opportunity to look more closely at the relationship between information processing and consciousness. In our article we contrasted the information processing approach to interpreting our data, with our own 'scientific' approach to consciousness. However, we should point out that, on our view, information processing as a methodology is not by itself in conflict with the scientific study of consciousness - indeed, we have adopted this very methodology in our experiments, which we purport to use to investigate consciousness. Furthermore, Durgin's own review of the history of research on metacontrast (Lachter & Durgin, 1999) shows that some researchers investigating metacontrast also thought that they were in the business of evaluating the role of consciousness in accounting for their effects. Yet, there is no doubt that metacontrast research is a paradigm case of research generated from an information processing perspective. So, prima facie, investigating consciousness and using information processing methodology are compatible

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
119 (#151,720)

6 months
10 (#276,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

An ostrich on a rock: Commentary on Christie and Barresi (2002).Frank H. Durgin - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (2):366-371.

Add more references