Ethics briefings

Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):375-377 (2010)

Authors
Abstract
Complementary and alternative therapiesThere has long been debate about the degree to which conventional health professionals should work closely with complementary and alternative medicine practitioners, if patients choose treatment from both. Some doctors are trained in conventional and alternative therapies but often, liaison depends on the type of therapy, whether it is regulated by law and whether it supplements conventional methods of diagnosis and treatment or claims to provide an alternative to them. Among the therapies often used by patients to supplement conventional medicine, but which do not claim to have a diagnostic purpose, are aromatherapy, massage, stress therapy, reflexology and hypnotherapy. Chinese medicine and homoeopathy are among those which are not statutorily regulated but claim to provide diagnosis and treatment. Practitioners of conventional medicine are often wary of unregulated treatments that supplant evidence-based therapy—even though not all conventional medicine has been proven by randomised controlled trials.The role of complementary and alternative therapies came under scrutiny in England in February 2010 when the Parliamentary Science and Technology Committee published a critical report on NHS funding for homoeopathy. 1 Focusing on whether government policy on homoeopathy was evidence-based, the Committee found a mismatch between the evidence and policy. Its main conclusion was that the evidence indicates that homoeopathy is not efficacious and does not produce results beyond the placebo effect. The Committee said that explanations for why homoeopathy was thought to work were implausible and that further homoeopathic clinical trials could not be justified. The amount that the NHS actually spends on homoeopathic therapies was left unclear and was subject to varying claims from the Society of Homoeopaths and the Health Minister.2 The Parliamentary report recommended that there should be a clear policy on prescribing placebos, including homoeopathic medicines, but the government has been …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2010.036392
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,386
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Values in Complementary and Alternative Medicine.Stephen Tyreman - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (2):209-217.
The Proper Role of Evidence in Complementary/Alternative Medicine.K. Hansen & K. Kappel - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (1):7-18.
Attitudes to Evidence in Acupuncture: An Interview Study. [REVIEW]Kirsten Hansen - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):279-285.
There is No Alternative Medicine.P. Louhiala - 2010 - Medical Humanities 36 (2):115-117.
Who’s a Quack?Neil Pickering - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):43-52.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-23

Total views
7 ( #893,665 of 2,271,950 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #822,813 of 2,271,950 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature