Review of Alan Gibbard's Thinking How to Live [Book Review]

Ethics 115 (2):406-412 (2005)
Abstract
I imagine that people will complain that the account of normative concepts defended in Gibbard’s new book makes the metaethical waters even muddier because it blurs the line between cognitivism and noncognitivism and between realism and antirealism. However, these labels are philosophic tools, and in the wake of Gibbard’s new book, one might rightly conclude that there are new and better philosophical tools emerging on the metaethical scene. The uptake of views about practical reasoning—as exhibited by planning—into debates about the (...) meaning of normative claims is a fruitful line of research. And, as Apt Feelings, Wise Choices made an initial bold step into novel and fruitful lines of research into the connection between psychology and morality, Thinking How to Live has also made an initial bold step into novel and fruitful lines of research into the connection between practical reasoning and normative semantics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/426347
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,564
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
From Epistemic Contextualism to Epistemic Expressivism.Matthew Chrisman - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (2):225-254.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
164 ( #33,214 of 2,235,798 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #100,616 of 2,235,798 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature