Economics and Philosophy 13 (1):61-77 (1997)
Ronald Dworkin's theory of equality of resources draws heavily on conceptual tools developed in economic theory. His criterion for a just distribution of resources is closely connected with two economic ideas: first, the idea that a distribution of resources reflects a concern for equality if it is envy-free ; second, the idea that such an envy-free distribution of resources is attainable as a competitive equilibrium from equal split. The objective of this paper is to show that the criterion of equality of resources has been misinterpreted by normative economics, largely due to Dworkin's own lack of precision, and that it needs to be reformulated in order to be intelligible. The dimensions along which the reformulation is needed concern the nature of the preferences used in what Dworkin calls the ‘envy test’ and the nature of the envy test itself.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
[Book Review] Theories of Distributive Justice. [REVIEW]John E. Roemer - 2000 - Social Theory and Practice 26 (2):327-345.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Libertarianism Vs. Marxism: Reflections on G. A. Cohen's Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality. [REVIEW]Jan Narveson - 1998 - Journal of Ethics 2 (1):1-26.
Equality of Resources and the Problem of Recognition.Rasmus Hansen - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (2):157-174.
Liberalism, Neutrality, and Equality of Welfare Vs. Equality of Resources.Larry Alexander & Maimon Schwarzschild - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (1):85-110.
Equality of Resources and Equality of Welfare: A Forced Marriage?T. M. Scanlon Jr - 1986 - Ethics 97 (1):111-118.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads23 ( #208,503 of 2,124,141 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #132,425 of 2,124,141 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.