American Political Science Review 114 (1):14-35 (2020)

Authors
Hun Chung
Waseda University
Abstract
Inspired by impossibility theorems of social choice theory, many democratic theorists have argued that aggregative forms of democracy cannot lend full democratic justification for the collective decisions reached. Hence, democratic theorists have turned their attention to deliberative democracy, according to which “outcomes are democratically legitimate if and only if they could be the object of a free and reasoned agreement among equals” (Cohen 1997a, 73). However, relatively little work has been done to offer a formal theory of democratic deliberation. This article helps fill that gap by offering a formal theory of three different modes of democratic deliberation: myopic discussion, constructive discussion, and debate. We show that myopic discussion suffers from indeterminacy of long run outcomes, while constructive discussion and debate are conclusive. Finally, unlike the other two modes of deliberation, debate is path independent and converges to a unique compromise position, irrespective of the initial status quo.
Keywords Deliberative Democracy  Democratic Theory  Formal Theory  Game Theory  Social Choice Theory  Legitimacy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation.Christian List & John Dryzek - 2003 - British Journal of Political Science 33 (1):1-28.
Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory.James Fishkin - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):71-78.
Doxa and Deliberation.Clarissa Rile Hayward - 2004 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (1):1-24.
Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Deliberative Democracy in the Context of the Problems of Democractic Legitimacy.M. S. Zakharchenko - 2014 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 6:82-88.
Deliberative Democracy in the Context of the Problems of Democratic Legitimacy.M. S. Zakharchenko - 2014 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 6:82-88.
Deliberative Democracy in Habermas and Nino.A. R. Oquendo - 2002 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (2):189-226.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-01-12

Total views
240 ( #47,859 of 2,533,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #14,777 of 2,533,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes