A Study of Roger Ames's Views on Translation of Classical Texts in Chinese Philosophy

Contemporary Chinese Thought 41 (3):77-87 (2010)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2753/CSP1097-1467410306
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,434
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mengzi Xin Xing Zhi Xue.James Behuniak & Roger T. Ames (eds.) - 2005 - She Hui Ke Xue Wen Xian Chu Ban She.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Philosophy of Roger Ames's Translation of the Analects.Chen Guoxing - 2010 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 41 (3):64-76.
The Meaning of Body in Classical Chinese Thought.Roger T. Ames - 1984 - International Philosophical Quarterly 24 (1):39-54.
The Classical Chinese Self and Hypocrisy.Roger Ames - 1996 - In Roger T. Ames & Wimal Dissanayake (eds.), Self and Deception: A Cross-Cultural Philosophical Enquiry. Albany: Suny Press.
Yin and Yang.Roger T. Ames - 2003 - In A. S. Cua (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 846--847.
Is Political Taoism Anarchism?Roger T. Ames - 1983 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 10 (1):27-47.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #718,809 of 2,280,338 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #831,662 of 2,280,338 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature