Is Zhuangzi a Fictionalist?
Philosophers' Imprint 18 (2018)
Abstract
This paper explores the possibility that Zhuangzi can be fruitfully interpreted as a fictionalist. It proceeds in four parts. Part one discusses two distinct and very general types of fictionalism—force and content—that might prove useful for an interpreter of the Zhuangzi. The former type of view would have it that the expressions in question—that is, the expressions that Zhuangzi is held to advocate using and interpreting non-literally—are not best seen as used in a way that aims at, e.g., truth, whereas the latter type of view would have it that the expressions in question are best seen as used in a way that aims at truth, if in a non-literal fashion. Part two surveys evidence in favor of the claim that Zhuangzi can be interpreted in terms of one or the other of these two types of fictionalism and argues that he is better characterized as endorsing a version of the former. Part three explains how interpreting Zhuangzi as a fictionalist can help to resolve notable tensions in the text and briefly explores a few additional merits of this reading of the Zhuangzi: namely, that it can give us a clearer idea of what Zhuangzi’s positive project is, unify seemingly disparate scholarly interpretations of it, and reconcile objectivist and non-objectivist strands in his work. Finally, part four concludes by gesturing toward how the interpretation proposed here might bring the Zhuangzi into productive dialogue with two longstanding philosophical questions: specifically, the question of how we should respond to skeptical arguments, and the question of how aesthetic features of works of art—and in particular, literature—might be related to their cognitive or epistemic value.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Vanishing Wild Card: Challenges and Implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi.John R. Williams - 2017 - Philosophy East and West 67 (1):177-191.
Following Nature with Mengzi or Zhuangzi.Franklin Perkins - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):327-340.
Naturalism and Moral Expertise in the Zhuangzi.Christopher Kirby - 2017 - Journal of East-West Thought 7 (3):13-27.
Zhuangzi’s Word, Heidegger’s Word, and the Confucian Word.Eske J. Møllgaard - 2014 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 41 (3-4):454-469.
The Question of Intersubjectivity in Zhuangzi.Agnieška Juzefovič - 2011 - Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija 18 (1):44-50.
Le Vol Inutile: Zhuangzi, la Conduite de la Vie.Claude Zhuangzi, Elisabeth Larre & Rochat de la Vallée - 1994 - Desclée de Brouwer.
Imagination in the Zhuangzi: the madman of Chu’s alternative to Confucian cultivation.Paul J. D’Ambrosio - 2017 - Asian Philosophy 27 (1):30-42.
Zhuangzi’s notion of transcendental life.Eske Janus Møllgaard - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (1):1-18.
Competing interpretations of the inner chapters of the "zhuangzi".W. Van Norden Bryan - 1996 - Philosophy East and West 46 (2):247-268.
Philosophy and philosophical reasoning in the zhuangzi: Dealing with plurality.Karyn Lynne Lai - 2006 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (3):365-374.
Sorrow and the Sage: Grief in the zhuangzi.Amy Olberding - 2007 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (4):339-359.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-12-19
Downloads
48 (#245,874)
6 months
2 (#297,430)
2018-12-19
Downloads
48 (#245,874)
6 months
2 (#297,430)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Apophatic Language, the Aesthetic, and the Sensus Divinitatis.Julianne N. Chung - 2020 - Journal of Analytic Theology 8 (1):100-119.
Taking Skepticism Seriously: How the Zhuang-Zi Can Inform Contemporary Epistemology.Chung Julianne - 2017 - Comparative Philosophy 8 (2):3-29.