Looks non-transitive!

Abstract
Suppose you are presented with three red objects. You are then asked to take a careful look at each possible pair of objects, and to decide whether or not their members look chromatically the same. You carry out the instructions thoroughly, and the following propositions sum up the results of your empirical investigation: <blockquote> i. red object #1 looks the same in colour as red object #2. </blockquote> ii. red object #2 looks the same in colour as red object #3.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Non-Transitive Looks & Fallibilism.Philippe Chuard - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (2):161 - 200.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Peacocke on Red and Red.Michael A. Smith - 1986 - Synthese 68 (September):559-576.
Red and 'Red'.Galen Strawson - 1989 - Synthese 78 (February):193-232.
The Disjunctive Theory of Perception.Matthew Soteriou - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2009 edition).
Vagueness and Observationality.Diana Raffman - 2011 - In Giuseppina Ronzitti (ed.), Vagueness: A Guide. Springer Verlag. pp. 107--121.
Colour for Representationalists.Frank Jackson - 2007 - Erkenntnis 66 (1-2):169--85.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
101 ( #51,722 of 2,192,001 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #289,023 of 2,192,001 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature