Suppose you are presented with three red objects. You are then asked to take a careful look at each possible pair of objects, and to decide whether or not their members look chromatically the same. You carry out the instructions thoroughly, and the following propositions sum up the results of your empirical investigation: <blockquote> i. red object #1 looks the same in colour as red object #2. </blockquote> ii. red object #2 looks the same in colour as red object #3.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Non-Transitive Looks & Fallibilism.Philippe Chuard - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (2):161 - 200.
Similar books and articles
Red Watermelons and Large Elephants: A Case Against Compositionality?Mark Siebel - 2000 - Theoria 15 (38):263-280.
18 From the Looks of Things: The Explanatory Failure of Representationalism.Diana Raffman - 2008 - In Edmond L. Wright (ed.), The Case for Qualia. MIT Press. pp. 325.
The Disjunctive Theory of Perception.Matthew Soteriou - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2009 edition).
Vagueness and Observationality.Diana Raffman - 2011 - In Giuseppina Ronzitti (ed.), Vagueness: A Guide. Springer Verlag. pp. 107--121.
Is Introspection Inferential?Murat Aydede - 2003 - In Brie Gertler (ed.), Privileged Access: Philosophical Accounts of Self-Knowledge. Ashgate.
The Colors and Shapes of Visual Experiences.David M. Rosenthal - 1999 - In Denis Fisette (ed.), Consciousness and Intentionality: Models and Modalities of Attribution. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 95--118.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads94 ( #51,861 of 2,146,236 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #120,373 of 2,146,236 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.