Why It’s Ok to Be of Two Minds

New York, NY: Routledge (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most of us experience the world through competing perspectives. A job or a religion seems important and fulfilling when looked at in one way; but from a different angle they seem tedious or ridiculous. A friend is obtuse from one point of view, wise from another. Continuing to hold both views at once can be unsettling, highlighting conflicts between our own judgments and values, and undermining our ability to live purposefully and effectively. Yet, as Jennifer Church argues in this book, inner conflict can be a good thing, and not just as a temporary road bump on the road to resolution. This book describes several desirable types of "double consciousness"--or being of two minds--and explains why and how they should be maintained. Church looks critically at some common ideas about identity, including a popular belief about narratives that suggests our lives should "make sense" as a story. She also examines how empathy can helpfully cause us to be of two minds, and how various forms of irony and laughter enable us to benefit from holding onto opposing views. Finally, Church shows the merit of acknowledging reality while sometimes being guided by fantasy. Why It's OK to Be of Two Minds is for anyone who's held two opposing views simultaneously, which is to say it's for everyone. Key Features: Argues against a longstanding philosophical idea: that it is important to resolve inner conflicts that result from competing systems of beliefs Examines the role of empathy and friendship in maintaining a valuable form of double consciousness Considers how irony and laughter allow us to dedicate ourselves to our particular projects while acknowledging their ultimate insignificance Shows how fantasies that conflict with our beliefs can make a positive contribution to the way we live our lives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Skepticism about Other Minds.Anil Gomes - 2016 - In Diego Machuca & Baron Reed (eds.), Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present. Bloomsbury Academic.
Perception, Evidence, and our Expressive Knowledge of Others' Minds.Anil Gomes - 2019 - In Anita Avramides & Matthew Parrott (eds.), Knowing Other Minds. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Other minds and perceived identity.Anil Gomes - 2009 - Dialectica 63 (2):219-230.
Animal Minds.Fred Dretske - 2001 - Philosophic Exchange 31 (1).
XII—Is There a Problem of Other Minds?Anil Gomes - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):353-373.
Adapted Minds.Larry Shapiro - 2001 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (sup1):85-101.
The analogical inference to other minds.Alec Hyslop & Frank Jackson - 1972 - American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (3):168-76.
The scientific inference to other minds.Robert Pargetter - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (2):158-63.
Seeing Other Minds.Steven M. Duncan - 2010 - Seattle Critical Review (on Line) 1 (1):1-30.
Evolution and the problem of other minds.Elliot Sober - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (7):365-387.
Adapted Minds.Larry Shapiro - 2001 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 27:85-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-21

Downloads
1 (#1,866,476)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Church
Vassar College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references