Ratio Juris 23 (3):333-364 (2010)
AbstractIn a variety of disciplines, there exists a consensus that human rights are individual claim rights that all human beings possess simply as a consequence of being human. That consensus seems to me to obscure the real character of the concept and hinder the progress of discussion. I contend that rather than thinking of human rights in the first instance as “claim rights” possessed by individuals, we should regard human rights as higher order norms that articulate standards of legitimacy for sociopolitical and legal institutions
Similar books and articles
On the Misconceived Genealogy of Human Rights.Gary B. Herbert - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:17-32.
Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Appeal to Separate the Conjoined Twins.Doris Schroeder - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323-335.
The Challenge of Human Rights: Origin, Development and Significance.John Mahoney - 2006 - Blackwell.
History, Human Rights, and Globalization.Sumner B. Twiss - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (1):39-70.
Human Rights and Concept of Person: Some Ethical Remarks.Barbara de Mori - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):159-169.
Protecting Human Rights: Instruments and Institutions.Tom Campbell, Jeffrey Goldsworthy & Adrienne Stone (eds.) - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
The Law of Peoples: With, The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.