Composing alternatives

Linguistics and Philosophy 40 (1):1-36 (2017)

Authors
Floris Roelofsen
University of Amsterdam
Abstract
There is a prominent line of work in natural language semantics, rooted in the work of Hamblin, in which the meaning of a sentence is not taken to be a single proposition, but rather a set of propositions—a set of alternatives. This allows for a more fine-grained view on meaning, which has led to improved analyses of a wide range of linguistic phenomena. However, this approach also faces a number of problems. We focus here on two of these, in our view the most fundamental ones. The first has to do with how meanings are composed, i.e., with the type-theoretic operations of function application and abstraction; the second has to do with how meanings are compared, i.e., the notion of entailment. Our aim is to reconcile what we take to be the essence of Hamblin’s proposal with the more orthodox type-theoretic framework rooted in the work of Montague in such a way that both the explanatory utility of the former and the solid formal foundations of the latter are preserved. Our proposal builds on insights from recent work on inquisitive semantics, and it also contributes to the further development of this framework by specifying how the inquisitive meaning of a sentence may be built up compositionally.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10988-016-9195-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,483
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Syntax and Semantics of Questions.Lauri Karttunen - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1):3--44.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What Do Quantifier Particles Do?Anna Szabolcsi - 2015 - Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (2):159-204.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Formal Semantics: Origins, Issues, Early Impact.Barbara H. Partee - 2010 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6 (1).
Conditionals, Meaning, and Mood.William Starr - 2010 - Dissertation, Rutgers University
Constraining the Derivation of Alternatives.Tue Trinh & Andreas Haida - 2015 - Natural Language Semantics 23 (4):249-270.
On the Characterization of Alternatives.Danny Fox & Roni Katzir - 2011 - Natural Language Semantics 19 (1):87-107.
Grammar, Ontology, and the Unity of Meaning.Ulrich Reichard - 2013 - Dissertation, University of Durham
Focus and Uninformativity in Yucatec Maya Questions.Scott AnderBois - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (4):349-390.
A Note on Contrast.Roni Katzir - 2013 - Natural Language Semantics 21 (4):333-343.
Formal Semantics and the Algebraic View of Meaning.Eli Dresner - 1998 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Logical Form in Natural Language: A Precis.William G. Lycan - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (1):31 – 35.
On the Meaning of Only.M. Ippolito - 2008 - Journal of Semantics 25 (1):45-91.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-25

Total views
21 ( #445,411 of 2,286,547 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #323,129 of 2,286,547 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature