Cognitive Science 42 (2):524-553 (2018)

Abstract
Sculptors, architects, and painters are three professional groups that require a comprehensive understanding of how to manipulate spatial structures. While it has been speculated that they may differ in the way they conceive of space due to the different professional demands, this has not been empirically tested. To achieve this, we asked architects, painters, sculptors, and a control group questions about spatially complex pictures. Verbalizations elicited were examined using cognitive discourse analysis. We found significant differences between each group. Only painters shifted consistently between 2D and 3D concepts, architects were concerned with paths and spatial physical boundedness, and sculptors produced responses that fell between architects and painters. All three differed from controls, whose verbalizations were generally less elaborate and detailed. Thus, for the case of sculptors, architects, and painters, profession appears to relate to a different spatial conceptualization manifested through a systematically contrasting way of talking about space.
Keywords Concepts  Culture  Discourse  Linguistics  Psychology  Semantics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/cogs.12510
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,677
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Perceptual Symbol Systems.Lawrence W. Barsalou - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):577-660.
The Production of Space.Henri Lefebvre - 1992 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Semantics And Cognition.Ray S. Jackendoff - 1983 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Principles of Categorization [Електронний Ресурс]/Eleonora Rosch.E. Rosch - 1978 - In Eleanor Rosch & Barbara Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
From “Thought and Language” to “Thinking for Speaking”.Dan I. Slobin - 1996 - In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 70--96.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Professional Conduct.Daniel A. Taylor - 2000 - National Council of Architectural Registration Boards.
The Architect in Employment.David Chappell - 1987 - Architectural Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-06-28

Total views
11 ( #809,656 of 2,432,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #467,285 of 2,432,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes