Referees, editors, and publication practices: Improving the reliability and usefulness of the Peer review system

Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):51-62 (1997)
The documented low levels of reliability of the peer review process present a serious challenge to editors who must often base their publication decisions on conflicting referee recommendations. The purpose of this article is to discuss this process and examine ways to produce a more reliable and useful peer review system.
Keywords peer review  reliability  validity  publication practices  manuscripts  grants  acceptance rates  rejection rates  behavioral sciences  medical sciences  physical sciences  physics  chemistry  objective  fair  innovative/original  training reviewers
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-997-0016-4
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Using a Dialectical Scientific Brief in Peer Review.Arthur Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

22 ( #226,207 of 2,164,237 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,237 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums