The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135 (1991)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords cross-disciplinary comparisons   evaluation   grant review   manuscript reviews   peer review   quality control   reliability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x00065675
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,282
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach.Jeffrey S. Poland - 1988 - Philosophical Review 100 (4):653-656.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mavericks and Lotteries.Shahar Avin - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 76:13-23.

View all 28 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Principles and Practices of Peer Review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Peer Review and Innovation.Raymond Spier - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):99-108.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-20

Total views
42 ( #213,192 of 2,285,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #249,472 of 2,285,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature