Fundamentality: Structures, powers, and a supervenience dualism

Abstract

If we want to say what “fundamentality” means, we have to start by approaching what we generally see at the empty place of the predicate “____ is fundamental”. We generally talk about fundamental entities and fundamental theories. At this article, I tried to make a metaphysical approach of what is for something to be fundamental, and I also tried to talk a little bit of fundamental incomplete and complete theories. To do that, I start stating the notion of “entity” and looking at the difference at perceived entities. The difference led us to talk about the entities’ structures and their powers, and about the supervenience between these last two. The supervenience talk made us to see the fight between emergentism and reductionism as the difference between the irreducibility of laws and the reducibility of powers and structures to lower-order domains. Then, we conclude that “fundamentality” is a mereological relation – a relation that a whole structure has to a certain combination of its structural parts or that a power has to a certain combination of its constituent powers – of to be identical and to exist in virtue of them.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Two Conceptions of Fundamentality.Mariam Thalos - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (2):151-177.
Varieties of supervenience.Brian P. McLaughlin - 1995 - In Elias E. Savellos & U. Yalcin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge University Press. pp. 16--59.
Global supervenience and reduction.Bradford Petrie - 1987 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (September):119-30.
Varieties of supervenience.Brian P. McLaughlin - 1994 - In Elias E. Savellos & Ümit D. Yalçin (eds.), Savellos, E.; Yalchin, O. (Eds.) Supervenience. Cambridge University Press. pp. 16--59.
Supervenience.Harold W. Noonan - 1987 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (January):78-85.
Supervenience and ontology.Daniel A. Bonevac - 1988 - American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (1):37-47.
Robust supervenience and emergence.Alexander Rueger - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):466-491.
Concepts of supervenience.Jaegwon Kim - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (December):153-76.
Varieties of supervenience.Robert Stalnaker - 1996 - Philosophical Perspectives 10:221-42.
Supervenience and nomological incommensurables.Jaegwon Kim - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (2):149-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
1,010 (#7,203)

6 months
26 (#46,220)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rodrigo Cid
Universidade Federal Do Amapá

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references