A test of the argument engagement model in Romania


Authors
Abstract
Hample, Paglieri, and Na’s model of argument engagement proposes that people en-gage in arguments when they perceive the benefits of arguing to be greater than the costs of doing so. This paper tests the model in Romania, a different culture than the one in which the model was developed, by using a 2 x 2 design.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,031
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Toulmin's “Analytic Arguments”.Ben Hamby - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):116-131.
Corporate Citizenship and Stakeholder Engagement: Maintaining an Equitable Power Balance.Bethel Ihugba & Onyeka Osuji - 2011 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 16 (2):28-38.
Story Similarity in Arguments From Analogy.Douglas Walton - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):190-221.
Putnam's Model-Theoretic Argument(S). A Detailed Reconstruction.Jürgen Dümont - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (2):341-364.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-04-02

Total views
9 ( #727,294 of 2,236,200 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #582,678 of 2,236,200 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature