Emilian Cioc
Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj
This text is an examination of the democratic public sphere in relation to the presently dominating crisis discourse. More precisely, we endeavor to expose assumptions, aims and consequences entailed by the discourse of crisis, hereafter considered as a rhetorical apparatus asserting that crisis reveals an unambiguous and mandatory nature of things imposing self-evident and thus non deliberative decisions concerning both singular existence and communities. The crisis discourse serves to endorse indisputable certainty and therefore to blur or even suppress indeterminacy. Nevertheless, and it is our guiding allegation formulated mainly in reference to Claude Lefort’s political thought, the possibility of democracy and of its public sphere depends constitutively on a unique indeterminacy. Our analysis proves that restoring certainty cannot but go along with a naturalist fallacy and an abuse of rhetoric power postponing deliberative-shaped democratic practices. This line of reasoning comes to define public sphere as a rhetorical counter-power strategy meant to reassert democratic indeterminacy
Keywords democracy   public sphere   indeterminacy   crisis   certainty   naturalism   normativity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,797
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy.Richard A. Posner (ed.) - 2003 - Harvard University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Setting up a new model of the democratic theory ‐ research on Habermas' theory of public sphere.Cui Zhang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:1095-1103.
The `Public' Up Against the State.Agnes S. Ku - 2001 - Theory, Culture and Society 18 (1):121-144.
Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet.Antje Gimmler - 2001 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (4):21-39.
Milestones in the Critique of the Public Sphere: Dewey and Arendt.Codruţa Cuceu - 2011 - Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):99-110.
Science as Public Sphere?Jesús Vega Encabo & F. Javier Gil Martín - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (1):5 – 20.
The Public Sphere.Jostein Gripsrud (ed.) - 2011 - Sage Publications.
Humanities and the Public Sphere: Scholarship, Language, Technology.Russell A. Berman - 2012 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2012 (159):173-186.
Pluralism Slippery Slopes and Democratic Public Discourse.Maria Paola Ferretti & Enzo Rossi - 2013 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 60 (137):29-47.


Added to PP index

Total views
2 ( #1,382,209 of 2,425,657 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #546,862 of 2,425,657 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes