The attraction of historical entitlements

Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (1):61-73 (2002)

Christopher Ciocchetti
Centenary College of Louisiana
In this paper, I examine arguments from Stephen Munzer and A. John Simmons and find that historical entitlement arguments for private property ownership are either too weak to justify poverty, as they must if they are to defend a property system wherein historical entitlement claims dominate, or they are subject to Jeremy Waldron’s “Proudhon Strategy.” I conclude that a general rights-based property system can accommodate the attractive aspects of historical entitlement arguments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1014933630012
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,966
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #295,205 of 2,236,040 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #234,001 of 2,236,040 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature