Causation in Early Modern Philosophy

The Leibniz Review 6:132-140 (1996)

Abstract

Hume observes in the Treatise: “There is no question, which on account of its importance, as well as difficulty, has caus’d more disputes both among antient and modern philosophers, than this concerning the efficacy of causes, or that quality which made them be followed by their effects”.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
4 (#1,288,094)

6 months
1 (#386,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Causation in Early Modern Philosophy.Kenneth Clatterbaugh - 1996 - The Leibniz Review 6:132-140.
Causation & Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy (Review).Eric Stencil - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):524-526.
Malebranche, Models, and Causation.Richard Watson - 1993 - In Steven Nadler (ed.), Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Leibniz on Causation – Part 2.Julia Jorati - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (6):398-405.
The Early Moderns.Kenneth Clatterbaugh - 2009 - In Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock & Peter Menzies (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford University Press.
Kenneth Clatterbaugh: The causation debate in modern philosophy: 1637-1739.L. A. Mcalinden - 2001 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83 (2):217-219.