I'm very happy here to be sandwiched between Lycan and Millikan, two of the living philosophers from whom I've probably learned the most, and to whom I am the most grateful. Plus the intermediary position is appropriate for someone commenting on intermediary representations in vision. There's much to like in Bill 's account of "layering" in visual representation. For one, it makes explicit and publicizes the notion that there are multiple layers of representation involved even in the seemingly simple achievement of.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Comments on Bill Lycan's Moore Against the New Skeptics.Earl Conee - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 103 (1):55 - 59.
Perceptual Representation / Perceptual Content.Bence Nanay - 2015 - In Mohan Matthen (ed.), Oxford Handbook for the Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 153-167.
Peter John Olivi on Perceptual Representation.Han Thomas Adriaenssen - 2011 - Vivarium 49 (4):324-352.
What is the Representation Theory of Thinking?: A Comment on William G. Lycan.Robert Stalnaker - 1993 - Mind and Language 8 (3):423-430.
Se E I N G a N D V I S U a L I Z I N G : I T ' S N O T W H a T y O U T H I N K'.Zenon Pylyshyn - unknown
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads18 ( #261,148 of 2,146,949 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #385,507 of 2,146,949 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.