Death, nothingness, and subjectivity
In Daniel Kolak & R. Martin (eds.), The Experience of Philosophy. Wadsworth Publishing. pp. 15-20 (1995)
The words quoted above distill the common secular conception of death. If we decline the traditional religious reassurances of an afterlife, or their fuzzy new age equivalents, and instead take the hard-boiled and thoroughly modern materialist view of death, then we likely end up with Gonzalez-Cruzzi. Rejecting visions of reunions with loved ones or of crossing over into the light, we anticipate the opposite: darkness, silence, an engulfing emptiness. But we would be wrong
|Keywords||Afterlife Death Metaphysics Nothingness Subjectivity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Reasoning About Dead Agents Reveals Possible Adaptive Trends.Jesse M. Bering, Katrina McLeod & Todd K. Shackelford - 2005 - Human Nature 16 (4):360-381.
Similar books and articles
Are Recent Defences of the Brain Death Concept Adequate?Ari Joffe - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (2):47-53.
Immanent Causation and Life After Death.Eric T. Olson - 2010 - In G. Gasser (ed.), Personal Identity and Resurrection. Ashgate. pp. 51-66.
Death and Liberation: A Critical Investigation of Death in Sartre's Being and Nothingness.Brian Lightbody - 2009 - Minerva--An Internet Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):85-98.
Being, Aevum , and Nothingness: Edith Stein on Death and Dying. [REVIEW]Antonio Calcagno - 2008 - Continental Philosophy Review 41 (1):59-72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads239 ( #14,867 of 2,164,554 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,971 of 2,164,554 )
How can I increase my downloads?