Exchange Relationships and the Environment: The Acceptability of Compensation in the Siting of Waste Disposal Facilities

Environmental Values 16 (2):187-208 (2007)

Authors
Abstract
Within siting literature there is strong agreement that compensation for environmental risks is a necessary condition for local acceptance of waste treatment facilities. In-kind compensation is commonly pushed forward as being more effective than financial benefits in reducing local opposition. By forcusing on the siting of a sanitary landfill in Santiago, Chile, this paper explores the performance of both types of compensation and relates the analysis to the notion of social norms of exchange. These are understood as being based on three main types of social relations: care, justice and freedom. Whereas monetary compensation is associated with market relations based on freedom and the offer of in-kind compensation to egalitarian relations based on justice, the absence of compensation is linked to fraternal relations based on care. It is argued that in-kind compensation is more acceptable than monetary payments or not compensation because people tend to understand siting conflicts more as matters of justice rather than as matters of freedom or care.
Keywords Exchange relationships  Waste  Compensation  Siting  Social norms  NIMBY
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3197/096327107780474519
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Value in Ethics and Economics.Elizabeth Anderson - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
The Theory of Moral Sentiments.Adam Smith - 1759 - Dover Publications.
Reason-Based Choice.E. Shafir - 1993 - Cognition 49 (1-2):11-36.
Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality.Jon Elster - 1979 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 48 (4):650-651.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Compensation Systems.Matt Bloom - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (2):149-152.
Does Distributive Justice Pay? Sternberg’s Compensation Ethics.Jeffrey Moriarty - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (1):33-48.
A Model Capturing Ethics and Executive Compensation.Waymond Rodgers & Susana Gago - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 48 (2):189-202.
An Ethical Perspective on CEO Compensation.Mel Perel - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 48 (4):381-391.
A Moral and Economic Defense of Executive Compensation.John Dobson - 2011 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (1-2):59-70.
How Much Compensation Can CEOs Permissibly Accept?Jeffrey Moriarty - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2):235-250.
Equity and Nuclear Waste Disposal.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1994 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (2):133-156.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-29

Total views
544 ( #8,291 of 2,285,919 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
99 ( #6,421 of 2,285,919 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature