Analysis 81 (4):747-758 (2022)

Authors
Justin Clarke-Doane
Columbia University
Abstract
Holly Smith has done more than anyone to explore and defend the importance of usability for moral theories. In Making Morality Work, she develops a moral theory that is almost universally usable. But not quite. In this article, I argue that no moral theory is universally usable, in the sense that is most immediately relevant to action, even by agents who know all the normative facts. There is no moral theory knowledge of which suffices to settle deliberation about what to do. However, this is unsurprising if the question of what to do is not a question of fact. One upshot of the discussion is that the search for a universally usable moral theory is misconceived. Another is that, contra Smith (341), agents who are radically uncertain need not lack autonomy.
Keywords Holly Smith, usability, moral theory, practical reason, motivation, deliberation, internalism, externalism, noncognitivism, akrasia, intention, open question, Hume  Moore, is/ought, agency, autonomy,  metaethics, normative ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/anab029
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Being Realistic About Reasons.T. M. Scanlon - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Utilitarianism.J. S. Mill - 1861 - Oxford University Press UK.
Thinking How to Live.Allan Gibbard - 2003 - Harvard University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ethics and the Question of What to Do.Olle Risberg - forthcoming - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Conceptual Analysis in Metaethics.N. G. Laskowski & Stephen Finlay - 2017 - In Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. Routledge. pp. 536-551.
Sentimentalism and the Is-Ought Problem.Noriaki Iwasa - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):323-352.
Must Morality Motivate?Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2002 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 37 (1):7-36.
Internalizm motywacyjny Richarda M. Hare'a.Krzysztof Saja - 2007 - Analiza I Egzystencja 5:179-202.
Dispositions and Fetishes: Externalist Models of Moral Motivation.James Dreier - 2000 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):619-638.
A New Theory of Noncognitivism.Wayne Fenske - 1995 - Dissertation, Dalhousie University (Canada)
The Amoralist and the Anaesthetic.Alex King - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (4):632-663.
The Motivation Argument and Motivational Internalism.Daniel Eggers - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2445-2467.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-06-06

Total views
178 ( #64,890 of 2,498,795 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #11,344 of 2,498,795 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes